What nationalising energy companies would cost – and how to do it

Image: Matthew Henry, Unsplash

JVL Introduction

Public ownership of energy is immensely popular – even 62% of Tory voters want it.

Here Andrew Fisher, former chief of policy under Corbyn, writing in openDemocracy, explains why it is both sensible and cost effective even in the short-term.

It was amongst Keir Starmer’s 10 pledges.

Labour already has a detailed plan, drawn up in 2019, as to how to re-establish a public energy ecosystem, run for people not for profit.

It would cost around £2.8bn to nationalise the Big 5 – and already £2.7bn has been spent bailing out the companies that have failed recently.

The big energy retail companies made £23bn in dividends between 2010 and 2020 – £43bn if you include share buy-backs.

Profit has failed disastrously as a regulator for use of our natural resources.

Wake up Keir Starmer!

This article was originally published by openDemocracy on Wed 17 Aug 2022. Read the original here.

What nationalising energy companies would cost – and how to do it

UK could bring National Grid and retailers in-house and build public renewable energy, says ex-Labour policy chief

When 62% of Conservative voters want energy run in the public sector, it’s fair to say the left has won the argument (75% of Labour voters agree, 68% of Lib Dems).

Yet public ownership is opposed passionately by the Conservative government, while the leader of the opposition has said he is “not in favour” of it – despite his election on a platform that committed to “bring rail, mail, water and energy into public ownership to end the great privatisation rip-off and save you money on your fares and bills”.

Public ownership is on the media’s radar, too. When Labour leader Keir Starmer announced his policy to freeze bills this week, he was asked why he wouldn’t also nationalise energy, replying that: “In a national emergency where people are struggling to pay their bills … the right choice is for every single penny to go to reducing those bills.”

But so long as energy remains privatised, every single penny won’t. Billions of pennies will keep going to shareholders instead.

The energy market was fractured under the mass privatisations of the Thatcher governments in the 1980s. It contains three sectors: producers or suppliers (those that produce energy), retailers (those that sell you energy), and distribution or transmission (the infrastructure that transports energy to your home).

It is important to bear this in mind when we’re talking about taking energy into public ownership. We need to be clear about what we want in public ownership and why.

By 2019, Labour had a detailed plan on how to do this – worked up by the teams around then shadow business and energy secretary Rebecca Long Bailey and then shadow chancellor John McDonnell. The plan is not the only way, but it illustrates what exists and how one could go about re-establishing a public energy ecosystem, run for people not profit.

The recent TUC report shows the cost of nationalising the ‘Big 5’ energy retailers – British Gas, E.ON, EDF, Scottish Power and Ovo – to be £2.8bn, which would go on buying all the companies’ shares. That’s a lot of money, equivalent to more than the annual budget of the Sure Start programme in 2009/10 (its peak year). But it’s a one-off cost, not an annual one.

And it’s not like the current privatised system doesn’t have its costs: since June 2021, the UK government has spent £2.7bn bailing out 28 energy companies that collapsed because they put short-term profits ahead of long-term stability – companies like Bulb Energy. We have spent billions of pounds already to get nothing in return. So £2.8bn is not a large amount of money to pay to gain these assets, rather than just bailing them out.

The big energy retail companies made £23bn in dividends between 2010 and 2020 according to Common Wealth, and £43bn if you include share buy-backs. What you choose to do with that surplus in public ownership is another matter: you could use it to invest in new clean energy or to lower bills or fund staff pay rises, rather than subject your workers to fire-and-rehire practices as British Gas did last year.

Labour’s previous plan also involved taking the distribution networks – the National Grid – into public ownership. This would end the profiteering at this level, too – with £13bn paid out in dividends over the five years prior to 2019. As Long Bailey said at the time, we need “public driven and coordinated action, without which we simply will not be able to tackle climate change”. Like previous nationalisations, the purchase of the grid and distribution networks could be achieved by swapping shares for government bonds. By international accounting standards, the cost is fiscally neutral as the state gains a revenue-generating asset, which more than pays for the bond yield.

The final part of the plan – and the most complicated – is production and supply. It would be impossible to nationalise the oilfields of Saudi Arabia or Qatar – and for good reasons we should want to leave fossil fuels in the ground, anyway, rather than contest their ownership.

And so what Labour proposed in 2019 was a mass investment in new renewable energy generation projects, with the public sector taking a stake and returning profits to the public. For example, under the ‘People’s Power Plan’, we proposed 37 new offshore wind farms with a 51% public stake, delivering 52GW alone by 2030, equivalent to 38 coal power stations. There were additional proposals for onshore wind, solar, and tidal schemes, as part of a 10-year £250bn Green Transformation Fund, which included other schemes like the Warm Homes insulation initiative.

Labour’s new shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves has promised a similar level of investment – a £28bn a year climate investment pledge.

Any surplus energy would then be sold on international markets, with a People’s Power Fund – a sort of sovereign wealth fund – to deliver public investment in local communities’ social infrastructure: a genuine levelling-up fund, perhaps.

Many people will say this can’t be done, but of course it has been before. The 1945 Attlee government nationalised energy and successive Conservative governments – including those of Churchill, MacMillan and Heath – were happy to have a nationalised asset. Harold MacMillan famously accused Margaret Thatcher of “selling off the family silver” when she privatised state industries.

When I was born in 1979, the National Coal Board, British Gas and British Petroleum were all publicly-owned or majority publicly-owned companies. Between them, they were the major suppliers of our energy. Our gas bills came from British Gas and our electricity bills from our regional electricity board (in my case Seeboard, the South Eastern Electricity Board), and coal and oil fuelled our power stations.

The regional electricity boards had been brought into being by the Attlee government’s Electricity Act 1947, when electricity companies were forcibly merged into regional area boards and nationalised. The Coal Industry Nationalisation Act 1946 and the Gas Act 1948 had together brought energy into public ownership.

Seeboard was privatised in 1990, and later became part of EDF Energy – ironically, the nationalised French energy company, whose profits from the UK’s stupidity are used to subsidise French consumers.

The French government has now fully nationalised EDF (previously it was 84% publicly owned), and household energy bills rose by just 4% this year – compared to over 50% in the UK and a forecast 200% by January 2023.

If Starmer doesn’t want to listen to me (or his own commitments from 2020), perhaps emulating the centrist Emmanuel Macron in this instance would be palatable?


JVL insert: Listen to Keir Starmer squirm when pressed by Martha Kearnery, trying to explain why he won’t nationalise the energy companies…


In his later years, Robin Cook argued: “The market is incapable of respecting a common resource such as the environment, which provides no price signal to express the cost of its erosion nor to warn of the long-term dangers of its destruction.”

From the depletion of fish stocks to the burning of the Amazon, profit has proved a failed regulator for use of our natural resources. The market has also failed to decarbonise at pace, or to end the scourge of fuel poverty.

On the media this week, shadow energy secretary Ed Miliband said Labour is “continuing to look at what the right long-term solution is for our energy system”. It is up to all of us to campaign for that solution to be public ownership – whether that’s from within the Labour Party (like me) or from the outside.

 

 

Comments (10)

  • Graeme Atkinson says:

    Nationalisation should be under workers’ control…or don’t the workers get a say?

    0
    0
  • Doug says:

    Perfect example of why JC and those around him were walked all over
    Stop playing fair with Capatalism
    The question that should be asked is ‘what do you do if the market is broken or corrupt ‘
    Let them fail no matter how big they are, don’t pay a penny
    For everything else give Regulators powers of unlimited fines and gaol time
    Establish a ‘Socialist Bank’ to protect our money and interests when Labour are not in power
    Clear Red Tories out of our party
    Use MSM and toilet papers as a cash cow, regulate them into the ground

    0
    0
  • The problem with the utilities is that the whole system for regulating them is artificial. They are not entities to which a market can apply. It seems to me that they are woefully short on capital investment, which suffers because cash-flow goes on dividends and interest charges (in Thames Water’s case, partly resulting from borrowings to pay off the money spent on shares in the original privatisation). [note:- share buy-backs are a curse in modern financial markets, where it’s all done on borrowed money and no one puts up real risk capital – except the “suckers”]. In other words, regaining control of the utilities ought not to cost much.

    0
    0
  • Les Hartop says:

    Some good ideas from Doug.

    Time to go on the offensive.

    0
    0
  • Sean O’Donoghue says:

    Labour Party policy is decided allegedly by National Policy Forum. Why does the NEC allow Starmer to spout off his views as if they are actual policy, but which he makes up on the hoof, without consulting the NEC or the NPF .

    0
    0
  • You can’t regulate what you don’t own and if you do own it why regulate it?

    0
    0
  • bob cannell says:

    As long ago as the 19th century economists (well one really) wer predicitng the ultimate concentration of enterprises into great monopolies. This has happened. There is no effective free market in energy, telecoms, water, transport, higher education and impending monopolies in food. We may have a Big5 energy providers but they are operating an informal cartel (illegal under EU rules and subject to multibillion fines as were Microsoft and Google, oh but…).
    The Tories even intervene when the market does operate price controls. A sharia compliant student loan fund in Manchester with an effective interest rate of 2% (because they charge admin fees not ongoing interest) was ordered to put the fees up to equal the 6% of the government suppliers or be forbidden to operate. Electricity prices are set at the gas rate, much higher than the wind rate. Renewables providers could undercut and create a dash for wind by consumers if they were allowed to price accordingly. The government forbids it.
    Free market economics are collpasing everywhere. The only alternatives are community control and state regulation. As they do across europe. Will our dinosaur leaders wake up and see the asteroid heading for neo-liberal land?

    0
    0
  • iankemp says:

    Totally agree . what on earth is the matter with Starmer ????

    0
    0
  • Bernard Grant says:

    Starmer has proven many times that he has no political nouse. Choosing Mandelson as an advisor sealed the proof.
    His reasons for not Nationalising the Energy Companies, was more proof of his lack of political nouse.
    I bet Ed Miliband has sleepless nights, when he remembers giving him a safe LP seat.
    Charities are struggling as people reduce or cancel donations, they are watching inflation going over 10% and the forecast of energy prices actually trebling. We must keep the pressure on Starmer, posting on Facebook and Twitter, emphasising the disaster we are heading for because of his lack of policies and challenges towards the Tories.

    0
    0
  • The phrase “working class” should be defunct. It is traditionally associated with lower paid and unskilled jobs but there is no real reason for this! Anyone who receives a wage should be regarded as working class even if that person is skilled, talented or highly paid they are still receiving payment for their services. This applies to those not normally described as “working class”. So an actor is working class, so is a doctor, professor, musician, or artist. Even pop stars could be classed as working class. think how many complain of exploitation by their record companies. If we broaden the concept of who is working class to its LOGICAL conclusion, then we would realize that their are only two categories of persons in society, the “working” class (those who do something for which they are paid) and the parasite class, ( most notably shareholders whose “money works for them”) This is, admittedly, a very sketchy outline and there are many variations of the situation but if “posh” people are regarded as part of the “working class” then their will be an immediate increase in our numbers and therefore our power!! I am an artist but I still recognize that I need customers same as a fish and chip shop.

    0
    0

Comments are now closed.