Reasons to see “Oh Jeremy Corbyn: The Big Lie”

Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi explains why a film which has been widely vilified and even banned deserves to be seen, heard and discussed.

Contact producer Norman Thomas on norm6344@gmail.com to arrange a screening in your area.

An outdoor showing is planned for July 29 near Bristol.

Click here to see a trailer.

Dancing robot Starmer, a still from "Oh Jeremy Corbyn: The Big Lie" by Platform Films.

Film review

Let me declare an interest. I am one of a number of Jews, current or recent Labour Party members, interviewed in the making of this film. I’m not going to deal with the campaign of lies and distortions being deployed to have it banned. We’ve tackled that elsewhere. This review attempts to explain why I’d like people to see it and hear our perspective, alongside that of non-Jewish comrades  grappling with a major political question: how did the movement around Jeremy Corbyn go from the dizzying heights of 2017, pulling off the largest increase in Labour’s share of the national vote since1945 and robbing PM Theresa May of her Parliamentary majority, to being comprehensively crushed just two years later?

The team behind “Oh Jeremy Corbyn: The Big Lie” make a good fist of setting out how the hopes of millions were destroyed. Director Chris Reeves is an old hand at producing videos and DVDs for trade unions, the public sector and campaigning organisations under the banner of Platform Films. Producer Norman Thomas’s script, engagingly narrated by popular Jewish comedian, writer and broadcaster Alexei Sayle, traces the relentless campaign of the political establishment to destroy the movement around Corbyn, terrified by the huge crowds attracted by his anti-capitalist, anti-war, anti-nuclear stance. As one activist quoted says: “It’s not Jeremy they’re afraid of, it’s us.”

Reeves and Thomas make lively use of visuals throughout the 80-minute documentary, including the dancing Starmer robot in the  image above. A recurring theme is Sir Keir’s pledge “I will bring our party together”. Like so many of his promises, and his profession of admiration and friendship towards Jeremy Corbyn, it is shown to be no more than empty words.

The film sets out a pretty incontrovertible case, marshalling newspaper headlines from 2015 onwards alleging Corbyn in Number 10 would be a security threat; he wouldn’t be prepared to press the nuclear button; “Corbyn the Collaborator” was a Czech spy; he had snubbed the Queen; he didn’t “believe in Britain”. We see archive footage of anti-Corbyn Labour rightwingers reacting in horror to their own party’s electoral success in 2017. Actors tap out on keyboards and phones the treacherous exchanges between senior party staff exposed in the Labour Files, deliberately undermining Corbyn and his LOTO (Leader of the Opposition) team, swapping racially abusive and misogynistic comments about his few parliamentary allies, plotting how to root out party members they called “nut jobs” and “Trots” (followers of the Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky), planning sabotage of the party’s 2017 election campaign including diverting funds away from constituencies where leftwingers stood a chance of winning seats for Labour, via a secret project based in Ergon House.

The smear that stuck

The film shows how these Herculean efforts failed to stop the Corbyn juggernaut. Such was the popularity of the principles espoused by Corbyn and his team, such was the energy generated among the tens of thousands, young and old, who flocked into the Labour Party under his leadership, some devastating new weapon was needed to derail it. The smear that would stick, as stated in the film by Jewish Israeli academic Moshe Machover, was “one of the Big Lies of our time – the lie of the Labour Party being infested with antisemitism.”

Through interviews with a number of knowledgeable Corbyn supporters, most of them Jewish and most now expelled from the party, The Big Lie explains how antisemitism, properly understood as hostility towards Jews because they are Jews, was re-defined to encompass criticism of the state of Israel. Jeremy Corbyn’s support for Palestine could therefore be attributed to hatred of Jews and his most prominent allies, starting with Ken Livingstone, could be targeted with spurious allegations and hounded out of the party. One of these committed socialists, Graham Bash, provides the most eloquent expression of the film’s thesis – that the Corbyn movement was confronted by “a coincidence of interests between the Zionist forces in the Labour Party and the right wing of the Labour party” and that these were not necessarily the same people. They worked together, supported by mainstream media, setting out to ensure that never again would they have to confront the danger of a potential Prime Minister supportive of Palestine, or a Labour leader who sincerely intended to fight the establishment.

It was, in a phrase coined by Moshe Machover, “a concerted, orchestrated campaign.” The narrator then names some prominent participants in that campaign while relevant logos are displayed. Some are Jewish (Board of Deputies of British Jews, Jewish Labour Movement), some not (Labour and Conservative Friends of Israel, We Believe in Israel).  Critics who’ve attacked the listing of pro-Israel, Zionist groups as evidence that The Big Lie promotes anti-Jewish conspiracy theories are guilty of conflating Jewish people, in all their diversity, with the state of Israel and the political ideology of Zionism. We are not a homogenous block with one, undifferentiated identity, and we regard attempts to treat us as such as frankly antisemitic. It’s also worth noting that lawyers consulted by organisers of the Glastonbury festival found no antisemitic content in the film. Their decision to pull it was, reportedly, the result of bullying and threats to the festival’s funding.

Too much apologising

Graham Bash is one of a number of those in the film who point to the inadequacies in the Corbyn camp’s attempts to stand up to the network of forces determined to crush the left. A feature of the film surprising to some of us who lived through the purge from its inception in 2016, is hearing Andrew Murray bemoaning the failure of the leadership to confront the antisemitism smears effectively. As chief of staff to then Unite the Union general secretary Len McCluskey, Murray was a key adviser to the Corbyn team and showed every sign at the time of favouring a doomed strategy of apologising to the attackers and failing to stand up for allies being attacked. Prominent casualties, starting with Livingstone, included Jackie Walker, Chris Williamson (both of whom appear in the film) and Marc Wadsworth. The film devotes little time to examining the origins of the allegations that were made. It would benefit from drawing a clear distinction between the kind of antisemitism which is prevalent in society and therefore present to some degree in the Labour Party, and the often distorted and exaggerated accusations levelled at Corbyn and his supporters.

Corbyn’s nemesis

A substantial section of The Big Lie is taken up with speculation about Keir Starmer’s role, initially as Shadow Brexit Minister ostensibly working alongside Corbyn for a Labour victory, and then – following the 2019 general election debacle – as his nemesis, replacing him as leader and hounding him out of the Parliamentary Labour Party. For an authoritative study of Starmer’s career, from young leftie lawyer to pro-NATO, pro-business, pro-Zionist scourge of Labour’s socialist wing, I recommend Oliver Eagleton’s The Starmer Project: A Journey to the Right. The film makers would have been well advised to stick to citing Eagleton’s book (described in the Economist as “an enjoyably hostile new biography”), rather than stretching credulity with the suggestion that Sir Keir might have been an undercover saboteur, “a spy-cop who infiltrated the Corbyn project just to bring it down”.

Nonetheless the evidence of Starmer’s duplicity and his determination to wipe every trace of Corbynism from the party is convincingly set out in the film: suspending his predecessor for saying what we know to be true about the factional exaggeration of antisemitism in the Labour Party; proclaiming that Corbyn will not be allowed to stand as a Labour candidate for the Islington North constituency he has served for 40 years; eviscerating the party’s leftwing activist base with a campaign of blatantly unjust disciplinary cases; imposing compliant candidates at municipal and parliamentary level against the wishes of local parties. It deals with how Martin Forde KC, commissioned by Starmer himself to investigate the party’s internal culture, came out with conclusions the leadership did not want to hear and was comprehensively blanked by the NEC, the parliamentary party and the media. Forde was particularly damning about the cavalier treatment of Black party members, in contrast to the party’s insistence that everything must be done to avoid offending Jews (though this concern applied only to Jews with an approved, pro-Israel identity).

Members fight back

The Big Lie loses its way, in my view, in a lengthy section platforming a succession of understandably disgruntled activists, expressing their anger and frustration, often intemperately, waving “Starmer out, Socialism In” banners and – in a number of self-indulgent sequences – acting out a spoof version of the Forde inquiry. When it was performed live on stage at the Rialto Theatre on the fringe of Labour Party conference in 2021, it had immediacy and relevance. It does not make good film footage. The Big Lie could be a tighter, more persuasive documentary if much of that material were to be edited out.

Although the film contains few revelations for those well acquainted with the Labour Party’s tyrannical internal regime, it is a useful source of information for the many who are aware of some skulduggery at work without knowing about its full extent.

There is also great value in giving a voice to Labour Party members who have suffered real harm and distress over the last 6-7 years and yet continue to stick by their principles. Some have extraordinary stories to tell, like Rebecca Massey who made a Subject Access Request (SAR) and unexpectedly discovered that her name was on a list of 11 members whose expulsion had been demanded by the Board of Deputies. The SAR revealed exchanges of memos between members of Starmer’s LOTO team and party staffers as they scoured Rebecca’s social media for a transgression they could use against her. She was expelled in May 2020 for posting a Tweet friendly towards former MP Chris Williamson.

The Big Lie celebrates the spirit of huge numbers of people who were motivated by the Corbyn project and the tens of thousands who are now defending their rights as workers, trade unionists, environmental and anti-discrimination campaigners, housing, health and food rights activists, advocates for refugees and asylum seekers and innumerable other causes.

It demonstrates the disastrous nature of Starmer’s increasingly authoritarian, intolerant Labour Party, and the importance of keeping the spirit of defiance alive. As film maker Ken Loach – perhaps the most illustrious victim of the purge – says towards the end of the film, even after the demise of the Corbyn project, “we are hugely strong, if we can get our movement together, now. But it’s urgent.” This is why the message of the film is important and why it deserves to be seen and its implications debated.

 

 

 

 

 

Comments (35)

  • Gerrard Anthony Sables says:

    We need to get the film on terrestrial TV before it becomes ancient history.

    2
    0
  • Geoff Marks says:

    When is it released on dvd

    2
    0
  • Linda says:

    What would be very helpful is a list of the TYPES of venues that have been willing to show “The Big Lie” (regardless of any pressure exerted on them). All of us could use that information to help us recruit similar local venues to show the film.

    For example, I’d have thought village halls might be willing to show it, especially if due care was taken to send ambassadors (preferably Jewish Non-Zionists) to do a pilot showing of the film beforehand to the Parish Council members beforehand. In view of the media coverage of Corbyn, the ambassadors would need to give convincing explanations to the Parish Councillors and public WHY the film WASN’T antisemitic, racist or extremist and WHY the lies told about Corbyn still matters to everyone today.

    By contrast, I think there’d be resistance from many faith groups to showing the film – they’d worry over damaging local ecumenical relationships and inflaming local tensions.

    1
    0
  • Steve Kelly says:

    I’ve not watched the film but I have a pretty good idea what is in it as I watched the 4 Al Jazeera Labour Files films including Martin Forde’s interview. The film needs to seen by as many people as possible.

    2
    0
  • Marilyn Payne says:

    I wish they’d consulted you, Naomi! I haven’t seen it yet but I’m sure your analysis is a good one.

    0
    0
  • Mary Sullivan says:

    I saw the film at the Whitstable Labour Club! The club is independent of the party; otherwise, the CLP would have banned it. However, attempts to find a venue in nearby Canterbury are ongoing. The Friends Meeting House would not allow the film to be shown.

    1
    0
  • Teresa Pursall says:

    Amongst those who’ve banned the film from being shown in any of their buildings is Unite. I’d be interested to know why they appear to be as fearful as the rest that people should understand what happened.

    0
    0
  • Stephen Carlill says:

    I saw this film at the Lexi Cinema in Kensal Rise, which is an independent cinema run by volunteers. The showing was followed by a Q & A with the Director. It appeared that most of the audience had not previously been aware that the allegations of anti-Semitism were largely invention. I think anyone arranging a screening should aim for a similarly innocent audience.

    0
    0
  • Julia says:

    I keep hoping this will be put out on vimeo or youtube, so those of us who can’t get to the showings can also have a chance to see it

    0
    0
  • Dan Lambert says:

    The Labour Party is, has been and looks like it always will be the B team of British capitalism.

    0
    0
  • Tim says:

    I, too, am considering arranging a screening in my home city. Anybody with advice on likely friendly venues, who don’t rely on funding that Starmer’s bootboys can threaten, would be most welcome. My first thought was the Friends Meeting House, but Mary Sullivan’s comment made me wonder. Are all FMHs likely to nix the idea or does each branch set its own rules autonomously?

    Similarly, any tips on spreading the word without alerting Starmer’s dirty tricks squad would be appreciated.

    0
    0
  • Martin Read says:

    The term, ‘anti-semitism ,’ just rolls off the tongue, seemingly without any need of justification. Clearly many are afraid to be tarred with the same smear. I asked at my local Cinema City, as they screened ’11 Days in May.’ ‘Anti-semitism’ was cited but without justification- the judgement had been handed down from somewhere higher up. “Anti-semitsm!” seemed to suffice, then shrugs. It’s easier if you’re just following orders.
    Likely, there will be many private home possibilities, frustrated and angry at how debate has been curtailed, but these are also likely to be of restricted space. Online? Would JVL be prepared to organise something? I appreciate that the position has been made very difficult but then that’s the point.

    0
    0
  • Christine Tongue says:

    I’m the optimistic old lady in the wheelchair in the film and I now run the Platform Films facebook page. Venues putting on the film are getting more and more varied – on a bus, in someone’s large garden, a barn, village halls who have ignored pressure to cancel and best of all, a care home where the manager said it would make a nice change from the sing-a-long Sound of Music! And next Saturday 29th July, it’s being shown in a sympathetic farmer’s field in the CENSORED festival. Email Norman on norm6344@gmail.com for details.

    0
    0
  • clint says:

    The Labour party and unions fully represent the Establishment to the detriment of the common man. They steal from us and then deny the facts.

    0
    0
  • tony corden says:

    Excellent analysis of the film which will be shown as part of the El Sueno Existe Festival near Machynlleth on Saturday 16th September.

    1
    0
  • Steve Lane says:

    For goodness sake. Put the film on YouTube.
    It is pointless showing it in odd venues here and there.
    No one but the already converted will bother to attend screenings.

    1
    0
  • Martha Young says:

    At the age of 82 I am still a teenager. Anyone telling me I can’t do something results in my wanting to do it. If it is banned it must be worth seeing

    1
    0
  • Elizabeth Warwick says:

    I find it difficult to put into words how distraught the assassination of JC by media and the Party made me. It still hurts and always will.

    0
    0
  • Carrie says:

    I would love to see it as I knew, at the time, that the establishment was having its way, as usual. There’s an interesting documentary about the assassination of Prime minister Palme of Sweden which resonates with this outrage to justice. The problem with accusations and lies is that it is extremely hard to shake them off. Just see how the press reacts to unsupported allegations in the future and what happens to those who fight against the system.

    0
    0
  • John says:

    Tim,
    Each Quaker Meeting House is the responsibility of the local group of Quakers advised by their Area Meeting board of trustees. So, because one group of Quakers has refused to allow the film to be shown in their meeting house, it does not follow that others will take the same view. What Quakers will not allow is overtly party politics in their meeting houses.

    0
    0
  • robert lizar says:

    Thanks so much, Naomi, for this excellent review. I’ve seen the film and believe it should be as widely shown as possible in order to expose the outrageous falsehoods perpetrated against the Corbyn project and its supporters. The present threats, false accusations of antisemitism and efforts to block the film are a continuation of the same widespread scandal. I do agree the section containing “spycops” speculation about Starmer is a distracting weakness and plays into the hands of critics who have tried to dismiss the whole film as driven by conspiracy theory. Even so, it’s still a must-see which deserves the widest distribution.

    0
    0
  • Linda says:

    Sorry this is going to be a long post because to properly answer Tim’s question, I have to explain how Friends manage their business (very differently from other groups).

    All Friends Meetings reach their own decisions on what is the RIGHT course of action for them about permitting specific events and groups to use the Meeting House.

    Any highly contentious proposal (eg showing “The Big Lie” in the Meeting House!) would almost certainly be decided through open-ended consultation by the Clerk(s) with EVERY Friend belonging to that Meeting.

    The Clerk(s) will try to discern the overall will and concerns of Friends; then they’ll draft an agenda item accordingly for the Business Meeting for Worship (BMfW).

    BMfW makes the final decisions on key matters affecting Friends and the Meeting House by working towards unity on what is to be done. All Friends are repeatedly encouraged to attend and take part in it.

    Quakers don’t host party political sessions in their Meeting Houses but are deeply concerned about ethics, social and political justice towards individuals and groups and sustaining honesty in public life. They’re trying to combat the oppression of the Palestinians. There are many Jewish Quakers (including those from Holocaust families) so there’s an equally deep concern to avoid any further hurt and distress to those who’ve already suffered so much.

    What I’d suggest , Tim, is that you contact the Clerk(s) of your local Meeting in person and in writing. Say why you feel the public interest and UK democracy have been so seriously damaged by the secret attacks on Labour 2016 onwards. Explain the heavy pressures exerted to stop “The Big Lie” from being shown anywhere – and audiences’ reactions when it has been shown. Send a copy of the film to the Clerk(s) with a request that they view it and decide whether to ask BMfW to rule if the film exposes such political wrongdoing as to merit that Meeting House showing it to a wider audience.

    If you go about it this way, AT LEAST local Quakers will have seen the film (Quakers as a group tend to be active in their communities and ingenious about getting things done!). AT BEST, the film will be shown in the Meeting House to Quaker-invited audiences and / or the general public.

    (Please remember, while it’s allowable to ask audiences to make voluntary donations, it isn’t acceptable to charge tickets)

    0
    0
  • Susan Price says:

    Members from my local Unite community branch organised two showings of the film one in a Unitarian chapel and the other in a working mens club Both were well attended and between them raised funds for the film producers, the local strike fund and refugees Neither had any issues.

    0
    0
  • James Mcdowall says:

    The truth has to be heard by as many people as possible. How they were lied to and deceived by this terrible group of people who would destroy Labour

    0
    0
  • Charlotte Prager Williams says:

    Thanks Naomi, a very interesting read, especially as I haven’t seen it yet and people around me are saying it’s full of ridiculous conspiracy theories. However, I didn’t understand the difference between your criticism of the
    “ lengthy section platforming a succession of understandably disgruntled activists, expressing their anger and frustration” and what you say further down: “There is also great value in giving a voice to Labour Party members who have suffered real harm and distress”.

    I haven’t seen it yet but am seeing it on Sunday on the Not the Andrew Marr show. I understand why the organisers are resisting making it available for streaming or DVD – as I understand it it’s a principled statement to encourage discussion and so needs to be shown in a public venue. I think this is a good policy.

    0
    0
  • Maureen Spinney says:

    So much injustice that we thought only Labour could address makes me want Starmer taken down from a position he has no right to occupy.

    0
    0
  • Philmo says:

    This I must see.
    It promises to provide details of all the skullduggery which has leaked out, much confirmed by Forde. Especially I’d like to see McNichol and Hodge pilloried!

    0
    0
  • Beverley says:

    I haven’t seen the film yet so just a quick follow up about the use of Friends’ Meeting Houses not being used for political purposes after Linda’s comprehensive advice. It may have changed (as I moved from the area 5 years ago and have lost touch) but Green Party meetings were held regularly in a local Friends’ Meeting House. That seems to indicate that there is some fluidity in stance about no political party use of their halls. Or perhaps the Green Party closely matches the Friends’ philosophical views so they were welcomed.

    0
    0
  • Malcolm Segall (Dr) says:

    A group of socialists recently held a showing of The Big Lie in the hall at the Forum in Tunbridge Wells. It was sold out. The film was followed by a lively discussion, greatly enhanced by the contributions of JVL’s Leah Levene.

    The showing was co-sponsored by myself, a Labour Party member, and Tunbridge Wells Labour Councillor Ray Moon. Ray was explicit that he was acting as a co-sponsor entirely in a personal capacity. Yet he immediately had the Labour whip removed, apparently on the totally spurious ground that he had somehow fallen foul of some stipulation in the report of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission on (alleged – my comment!) antisemitism in the Labour Party.

    Keir Starmer’s Labour Party now owes more to Joseph Stalin than to Keir Hardie. The total abrogation of inner-party democracy and respect for freedom of expression is intolerable. The grounds for Ray’s suspension of the party whip are not simply unjust; they are so weak as to be laughable.

    0
    0
  • Phil Stevenson says:

    Sadly I have recently resigned from the Labour Party. Stormer is a hypocrite and liability in my view. The current purge of the left and backsliding on previous commitments are unacceptable. The party is obsessed with focus groups and trying to win back Red Wall voters. It is now a party without principles. Starter is very lucky, he is unpopular throughout the country, but the Tory implosion means has he has a realistic chance of becoming PM. Hopefully it will be a hung parliament, a coalition with the Lib Dems and hopefully the Greens. We may then have a chance of some radical initiatives.

    0
    0
  • Brian Boyton says:

    The quicker that this gets put on YouTube or other streaming services so the electorate can see how they were lied to the better.

    0
    0
  • Andrew Nicholas Connell says:

    Not seen the movie, so won’t comment on it. My perception of Corbyn is that he’s a dimwit whose thinking is stuck in his left-of-centre student days in the 1960s. For example, the Common Market/EEC/EU was – and remained – a ‘rich man’s club’ – hence his subsequent abysmal performance over Brexit; the state of Israel was and remains Zionist/imperialist – hence subsequent accusations of antisemitism. In 2017 the sheer incompetence of the Theresa May’s coterie in calling an unnecessary election and then mounting a silly ad hominem campaign against Corbyn enabled him to come out well by keeping his mouth shut and looking dignified and slightly pained. Unfortunately, by 2019 he had had a few things to say, and it had become apparent that the wise old man with a white beard was probably only two of these things. Was there really a ‘Corbyn project’?

    0
    0
  • Michael Clancy says:

    A persuasive alternative to Paul Mason’s weak and issue-avoidant article in Labour List of 19th June.

    1
    0
  • Bernard Grant says:

    I watched this, believe it was the film we all wanted to see. Can someone please tell me if it is or isn’t. Thank you
    Oh Jeremy Corbyn-The Big Lie.
    https://youtu.be/9TACIA7oSIk

    0
    0

Comments are now closed.