B.Michael holds “concerned Israel” to account

"Concerned Israel" on the streets. Image: France24 screengrab

JVL Introduction

B.Michael is renowned as Israel’s most sardonic commentator. Nothing is sacred as he exposes so many of Israel’s central myths and sacred beliefs as thinly-veiled tissues of misrepresentation.

In this Haaretz opinion piece he takes on “concerned israel” which he finds totally self-deceiving when it comes to recognising the undemocratic reality of the democracy it claims to be defending.

This article was originally published by Haaretz on Mon 20 Feb 2023. Read the original here.

With or without the judicial overhaul, Israel lags far behind even the worst European states

A concerned Israel is loudly bashing its hands together: “Gevalt,” they are screaming at one another: “If the scheme of Levin and his rottweilers succeeds, then we will be like Poland! The same as Hungary! Oy, how will we hide our shame?”

If this is true, then we can calm down. The comparative research I conducted between these three aforementioned countries led to an unambiguous finding: Even if the no-rule-of-law gang wins, even if it realizes the justice minister’s entire dream – and all the judges in Israel will be members of the Likud Central Committee and rabbis of Otzma Yehudit – we will still not be like Poland or the same as Hungary. And that’s a shame. If only we were a bit more like them.

Here are some of the findings of my research, and we can start from the daily trifles: The study found that in both Poland and Hungary there is public transportation 365 days a year. On holidays, too, and also on the Sabbath. Interesting. It also turns out that in the hospitals in Poland – and in Hungary – eating bread is allowed 365 days a year. There is no obligation to bring hospitalized patients only dry rusks for an entire week. Truly interesting.

It also turns out that in Hungary – and in Poland, too – a Catholic can marry a Buddhist, a Jew may marry a Christian and a Muslim can wed a Zoroastrian, without the groom having to prove a part of his penis has been cut off, without prying into the bride’s mitochondrial genes and without needing a flight to Cyprus. Quite strange.

Here are a few more differences: Poland and Hungary do not operate a military dictatorship that rules over millions of people, steals their property, cheapens their lives and suffocates their vitality. In both countries, when one person shoots another person in the head – always, but always – a police investigation is opened, without any difference based on religion or nationality, and that’s already something quite bizarre.

Hungary and Poland are not ruled by a band of holy priests whom no one elected, and neither country has a legally operating parallel legal system – which does not have even a single female judge – whose guiding lights are misogyny and racism, and which is based on a system of laws born from a heavenly myth during the Bronze Age.

They don’t support with public funds tens of thousands of idlers who do not contribute or create anything – and they don’t spend enormous sums on maintaining nests of armed rioters who take their revenge on their neighbors to make their lives miserable and rob them.

In short, the attempt to argue that if the legal system here is castrated, we will become like Poland and Hungary is an empty pretension. Israel has a long way to go before it will be worthy of comparing itself to any country in Europe, even the worst of them.

True, in Poland and Hungary nationalist and dark leaders rule, and they are “illiberal democracies,” a phrase that is no less an oxymoron than “Jewish and democratic.” Maybe that is the only point of similarity between the three.

The only country in the region that Israel is suitable to be compared to is Iran. The similarity is almost amusing: Both are controlled by religious priests, shoot those who rise up without hesitation, operate according to a codex that is thousands of years old, and exclude women in a self-righteous and evil manner. And both lie about matters of nuclear fission. The similarity is so vivid that it is not at all clear over what they are fighting each other. They need to make a twin-state alliance, establish an entity to be called “Isran” and together bring forward the redemption.

And what will be with the “bomb?” No problem, between us and them there is enough for everyone – we’ll share.

Comments (6)

  • Linda says:

    Ouch! Well said but – ouch!

    0
    0
  • Emma Tait says:

    ???????? B. Michel. Well said.

    0
    0
  • Naomi Wayne says:

    This is one of your ‘laugh to stop yourself crying’ posts. It would be very funny if it wasnt very true

    0
    0
  • tom Goodall says:

    For me, this is an eye-opener. Please keep supplying information on the life of progressives in Israel and for instance what are the voting / legal rights of non practising Jews and people of other persuasions living in the state

    0
    0
  • Eddie Dougall says:

    tom Goodall: I echo your comments. The kind of detailed analysis by B.Michael of the day-to-day workings of this apartheid State is a revelation, showing how far Israel has fallen to where no civilised State should engage with it in any way, unless it changes radically. Universal BDS for a start, to help the Israeli government understand how the civilised world sees them.

    0
    0
  • Alasdair MacVarish says:

    Amused to read about the Jewish caliphate. More articles like this please.

    0
    0

Comments are now closed.