Forde elaborates his critique – but will Labour listen?

JVL Introduction

Martin Forde’s critique of the Labour party’s response to his report has finally made it into the heart of the party with LabourtList reporting on Compass’s online webinar on the topic the previous evening.

In this event Forde gave a low-key-without-a-hint-of-rancour but nevertheless highly disturbing account of how he and his fellow report drafters have been shafted by the Labour machine. (We reported yesterday on how he has not been allowed to discuss the report with to the NEC.)

It represents a chink in Labour HQ’s armour, protected to date by a near total silence on Forde by any group or media outlet that might be able to force the Labour leadership in its bunker to take notice.

So too does the Guardian article “Starmer challenged on promise of ‘zero-tolerance’ on antisemitism and racism” by its political correspondent Aletha Adu.

Maybe, just maybe, the times they are a-changin’…

This article was originally published by LabourList on Tue 21 Mar 2023. Read the original here.

Forde speaks out about factionalism and the Labour Party’s response to his report

“I don’t think the party’s going to progress as a credible political force unless the infighting can be diminished.” That was Martin Forde KC’s stark warning for Labour during an event hosted by think tank Compass last night. Forde led an inquiry into allegations of bullying, racism and sexism within Labour that concluded in a report last year that there are “serious problems of discrimination in the operations of the party”. A number of Labour MPs have raised concerns about the party’s response to Forde’s report in recent weeks, and these were echoed by Clive Lewis who appeared alongside Forde on yesterday’s panel. The MP for Norwich South told attendees: “I really do hope… Martin, that your report is given more of a hearing and actually more of it is taken on board, not just in terms of the letter, but the spirit of it. Because I think it’s essential for the future of the party.”

Forde reiterated what he set out in his report about there being a “perception of a hierarchy of protected characteristics” in the complaints handling process, telling attendees that “there were certain groups of protected characteristics who felt their complaints were not taken as seriously or were not processed as quickly”. Forde said: “I had a lot of worrying emails from [Constituency Labour Party] members and also from councillors, prospective councillors and activists, saying that they felt that they’d been an emphasis on sexual impropriety and Me Too and on antisemitism, but there had been a lot of long-standing and lingering complaints around the other protected characteristics.” He also highlighted the number of complaints from party activists and prospective councillors that there had been occasions “where there have been allegations made against them, which had taken so long to resolve that they felt quite strongly that those had been tactical, also exclusions to thwart them from progressing within the political hierarchy”.

“I think part of the reason that factionalism has arisen around this is because there is a perception that different groups are treated differently,” Forde said, noting that the “so-called opposing factions” are “still cherry-picking” some of the things he has said about his report in recent weeks “in support of their factional view”. He told the event: “It seemed to me that if the membership had confidence in the transparency and independence of process, there would be less complaints.” He stressed the need for sanctions guidance to ensure people “have some idea of the likely punishment for any given complaint” and particularly highlighted the issue of time limits within the disciplinary process, saying: “I hate the idea of people hanging around in limbo for lengthy periods of time, because I think that really does diminish confidence in the disciplinary process.”

Forde appeared to criticise Keir Starmer’s pledge to ensure “zero tolerance of antisemitism, of racism, of discrimination of any kind” following the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) announcement that it was concluding its monitoring of Labour, which began after the equality regulator’s investigation into allegations of antisemitism within the party. Forde said last night: “I get slightly irritated by zero tolerance as a phrase. We’ve heard it from the Met, we’ve heard it from various politicians. But you can’t implement zero tolerance, it seems to me, unless you’re policing things fairly rigorously and you’ve got transparent systems in place.” He particularly expressed concern about the party’s decision not to establish a separate legal directorate to oversee its disciplinary system. Commenting following the event, a Labour spokesperson said: “We made a commitment on all protected characteristics to the EHRC and to the public. We’re meeting that commitment.” Forde separately voiced his disquiet about the process of proscription and the “retrospective application of that”, saying: “It just seemed to us to be concerning that if you’d attended such a meeting or expressed support in social media prior to the organisation being proscribed, that your historical interaction could be used as a current basis for expulsion.”

In other Labour news, Momentum has appointed long-term organiser Rachel Godfrey Wood as its new head of organising and political strategy, announced in a joint piece for LabourList by Godfrey Wood and Momentum co-chair Kate Dove. They write: “We face a battle for survival against an authoritarian, anti-socialist leadership. No wonder many on the left have questioned: is there a point to staying in Labour? Our answer is unequivocal: yes.” Godfrey Wood and Dove set out in the piece Momentum’s plans to “adapt to a new political context” given the “limited potential for advance at the national level”, announcing a “new phase” for the organisation “aimed at strengthening our local and institutional bases, within and through Labour”.

Comments (7)

  • Dwyer Mary says:

    Praise for Martin Forde for not letting this important document be buried.

    0
    0
  • Neil g says:

    Martin Forde has stated what many of us have personally experienced and witnessed from comrades still in the Labour Party and those who no longer carry the card. It shows the weakness of a dictator when he commissioned a report and then dismisses its findings – because it doesnt support his political agenda. Add to that, the latest attempt to silence discussion by the NEC of the Forde report. Its an open “secret” about Starmers “hierachy of racism”, but even the sterilised MSM is picking up on some of the issues raised by Forde.
    Its ironic that John Ware and the BBC have been calling for retraction and deletion of elements of Martin Forde`s conclusions, whilst skewing reportage and misleading the public. Martin Forde has opened a door which Starmer and his apparatchiks wont be able to close.

    0
    0
  • Jack T says:

    Under Starmer, the LP has become a standard bearer for Zionism. This is at odds with the Socialist founding and basis of the LP. For this reason, unless those with influence within the Party speak out loudly and forcefully against the right wing antidemocratic path which Starmer and his sheep are following, the report will continue to be ignored.

    0
    0
  • Pete Firmin says:

    We shouldn’t forget that Starmer originally only wanted an investigation into who leaked the document, not into the appalling behaviour by Party employees that it exposed. Reluctantly, he accepted having Forde deal with the content. So not terribly surprising that Starmer doesn’t want to deal with what Forde reported. But the Party is still pursuing 4 people through the courts over the leaking, even though they have no proof that they leaked, the information commissioner says there is no evidence that they leaked and Forde effectively says the leak was in the public interest. Despite all that, the Party is proceeding, with al the stress and cost that involves for the 4 they are determined to drag through the courts.

    0
    0
  • Allan Howard says:

    On a page on the LPs website entitled What is the Forde Report?, and at the start of a section headed ‘NEC Statement on the Forde Report’, it says the following:

    The Labour Party apologises for the culture and attitudes expressed by senior staff in the leaked report, as well as for the way in which those comments came to light.

    What it should have read is…. ‘… as well as for the way in which those comments came to light, because we really wish they hadn’t.

    I think we can all safely assume that but for the leaking of the document, they would never have come to light!

    And a bit further down that section is an apology from the General Secretary, David Evans, that begins thus:

    On behalf of the Labour Party, I want to apologise to you for the culture and attitudes expressed by senior staff in the leaked report, as well as for the way in which those comments came to light.

    https://labour.org.uk/fordereport/

    0
    0
  • George Peel says:

    I believe Akehurst is trying to talk-down and disparage Martin Forde KC’s concerns, in his own inimitable and disparaging way.

    “I think there had been an assumption that his involvement ended when he submitted his report, not that there would be engagement or commentary after the task he was contracted and paid for had ended.”

    “Compass isn’t really at the top of my list of organisations to take seriously”

    Hopefully, he will have picked on the wrong ‘victim’, this time.

    0
    0
  • Stephen Richards says:

    “Forde appeared to criticise Starmer…………..” well maybe, perhaps, in a way, but not directly?

    0
    0

Comments are now closed.