22 thoughts from Paul Mason

Durham Miners' Gala, July 2018

JVL introduction

There is much speculation and media rumour of a right-wing breakaway of some Labour Party MPs. In his notes in the Medium, Paul Mason (journalist, film-maker and author of Postcapitalism — A Guide to Our Future) offers some reflections

 

Be left. Be radical. Be Zen…

Some notes on the current British political situation

This is a short document about the current political situation — the Tory meltdown and the potential move to create a centrist party. If you agree with it please share it with other left-wing and progressive people, discuss it and act on it.


  1. The Tory government is at risk of chaotic failure, triggering (a) an autumn election which Labour wins or; (b) growing mass protests and economic chaos, as it careers towards a no deal Brexit, followed by (a), early in 2019.
  2. As a result, millions of people are about to get a demonstration of how elite power works in Britain. As Labour goes 5% ahead in the polls, a small number of Labour MPs and members are making signals that they are about to leave and either join or form a centrist party.
  3. The purpose of triggering a Blairite split from Labour is not primarily to form some new, viable centrist force. Its primary aim is to prevent a Labour government. Why?
  4. Since the miners’strike Britain has become a stronger democracy, with institutions like the Supreme Court; formalised parliamentary procedures (eg the Committee system) and a politically accountable police force and prosecution service. Plus there is now an alternative to monopolised private media.
  5. The “old” method of dealing with a left-wing Labour government — sabotage by unaccountable elements of the executive as in 1924 or under Wilson — has become impossible. The “very British coup” has to take place before the election, not after it.
  6. The free-market economic system that underpinned both Blair/Brown, Cameron/Clegg and the Major era has fallen apart. The choice facing the UK elite is either to: (i) create a right-wing nationalist dystopia, crashing out of the EU to become Trump’s client state, mobilising xenophobic and racist rhetoric or; (ii) an economy with much stronger state intervention, regulation, welfare, higher taxation and state investment, defending a multilateral, rules-based system, with the strong links and regulatory alignment with the EU needed to do that.
  7. The Tory party is too divided, the Libdems too weak, and the SNP too obsessed with independence to resolve this dilemma effectively. Only Labour can execute a state-led, Europe-oriented high-welfare revival of British capitalsm. But…
  8. For a small ultra-right fragment of the Labour Party, allowing Jeremy Corbyn into 10 Downing Street, and allowing an energised, mass party membership to dictate policy, breaks every political instinct. When they accuse him of being a “national security threat”, or a “racist and anti-semite” etc. what they are really doing is to try to make Labour unelectable.
  9. A Labour government in this circumstance, even with a majority of MPs coming from traditional centre-left politics, is too big a risk for one section of the British elite to take.
  10. The actions it would need to take to revive growth, revive dynamism in small towns and boost wages in the precarious and low-paid end of the economy threaten the vested interests of hedge funds, offshore finance, property speculators, outsourcing companies and that segment of British society which manages the money of foreign dictators and crooks.
  11. It also threatens the interest of the despotic and unjust foreign governments who have relied on the Conservative and Blairite support throughout this century, for arms supplies and diplomatic cover. They have every interest in using soft power and intelligence activity to prevent Labour coming to office, and the growth of the private intelligence industry means it can be done using proxies.
  12. Any new centrist party might attract Tory rebels alongside neocons from the Blairite tradition. Either it will be formed around the infrastructure of the Libdems, or as a new party. Its purpose would be to take as many seats as possible from Labour and then facilitate a new Tory-Libdem coalition.
  13. The Labour Party will emerge stronger if it continues to be a broad church: an alliance of traditional centrist social-democrats, including people who subscribe to the Third Way doctrine that inspired Blairism, centre-leftists from the Brown/Ed Miliband days, Momentum, the unions and the new social movements and the “Blue Labour” tradition.
  14. The left needs to understand that parties in a first-past-the-post system are always coalitions; and that the UK labour movement’s attachment to reform, gradualism, partnership with employers etc is not some Blairite import but a legitimate political tradition that needs to be respected, even if you disagree with parts of it.
  15. We should do everything possible to maximise the amount of space inside the party for differing views: on Brexit, on Israel-Palestine, on anti-austerity policy, on Scottish independence, on Trident, on NATO, on gentrification and outsourcing etc — and on all the other legitimate differences a mass social-democratic party has to contain.
  16. The experience of Summer 2016 shows that, if they go, the quitters will aim to create maximum rancour and disruption. The sensible thing to do is to simply congratulate them on their decision, thank them for their work in the past, and get on with our own activity: picking new MP candidates, launching weekly surgeries, positively campaigning for the Labour Party’s policies.
  17. If someone sits in your house calling you a racist, making your life a misery, trying to damage your mental health and generally disrupting your life — why would you start persuading them once they packed their bags?
  18. The broadcast news, the radio talk shows and most major newspapers will big-up any new party, or the expanded Libdem party. That is their de facto role in the elite power system: to prevent progressive change. The leading decision makers have been educated and trained from birth to defend the system of corporate power and hereditary wealth and, whatever rules constrain them, that will be their instinct. If a Labour MP splits, just tot up the number of times that MP has been hosted on the politics programmes, versus equally talented loyal ones you never see on TV, and you’ll understand what’s been going on.
  19. Don’t get angry, just switch off the TV news if you can’t stand it, or complain to Ofcom; only buy the newspapers that report fairly, boycott those who don’t and donate money to the growing number of online media outlets that reflect the radical new politics of hope. Meanwhile insist on the rules being applied: HM Opposition has media rights other parties don’t.
  20. Once the people who want to leave, they’re gone. They will feel happier and so will we. The Labour Party will have to make tactical alliances with them in future, for example on softening Brexit, defending democracy etc. But their moral right to argue with Labour members, influence us, slag us off, call us names, gaslight us etc will evaporate. Likewise their MPs will no longer be able to sabotage a Corbyn government from within, which was their Plan A, or covertly sabotage Labour’s election campaign, as in 2017.
  21. So lets not fret, let’s not waste time calling them out on social media, or indulge in the nasty atmosphere they want to create. Concentrate instead on one task…
  22. Labour must be the force that unites Britain: around the closest possible economic relationship with Europe; the strongest form of devolved government for Scotland; a new economic model that delivers high wages, high welfare and high growth; promotes women’s rights actively in the face of a global misogynist backlash; and a foreign policy that strengthens the multilateral global system and refrains from wars of aggression.
  23. The ancient Greeks called this kind of leadership hegemony: leadership through persuasion and moral authority, trust and the creation of a shared narrative. The left, resurgent as it is, could never lead Britain in the way the Tories are trying to — through manipulation, panic, abuse of power and a propaganda press.
  24. Everybody who agrees with the above strategy should stay in Labour or join. With the people who brought us war, rendition and privatisation gone, the way is open to a better dialogue with, for example Green voters and the pro-independence left in Scotland. Labour can, if we get this right, become the centre of gravity for all progressive politics and social movements. So in the face of the nastiness, lies and hypocrisy: just be left, be radical, be Zen.

Comments (3)

  • Mary Davies says:

    Great article.

    0
    0
  • Naomi Wayne says:

    Great set of principles. Just two concerns. As an argument for uniting Britain, it would have been good to see it include the need to move beyond our current first past the post voting system. This entrenches a ‘winner take all’ philosophy, which has led to the Brexiteers being able to talk about the ‘will of the people’, ignoring the fact that the people were actually split not far short of fifty fifty.

    The other concern is hitting up against the limitations of Mason’s call for diversity, dialogue and exchange. He calls for ‘Everybody who agrees with the above strategy’ to stay in Labour or join. I have been a Labour Party member and a wretched experience it was (without antisemitism rearing its head!) Wild horses wouldn’t drag me back in, but I still (mostly) vote Labour, and when I dont, I vote Green, but only when I know it won’t damage my Labour candidate’s chances. There are many like me whose left politics stretch back over decades but who aren’t Labour Party members. Time for Mason, and others on the Labour left to start respecting our position and seeking to work with us, not trying to marginalise us or obliterate our independence.

    Otherwise, yes, its a terrific strategy!!!

    .

    0
    0
  • Danny Nicol says:

    It’s not a great article or a great set of principles if one happens to be a socialist.

    He calls for stronger state intervention then (just like Theresa May) lauds the multilateral rules-based system – don’t people realise that’s the one created by Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton et al through the WTO etc to block progressive state intervention?

    He calls for the strongest economic relationship and regulatory alignment with the EU regardless of the EU bans on public ownership (via prohibitions of public monopoly and creation of a corporate freedom of establishment) and EU supervision of State Aids.

    I had not noticed an energised party membership deciding policy – I thought we were still saddled with the Kinnockite-Blairite NPF, with which the Labour Fake Left now seem very happy.

    He thinks having a Supreme Court which can nullify statute represents an increase in democracy. What when they nullify a nationalisation statute? To adapt a Tony Bennism, they hold power: how do you get rid of them?

    Is the Labour Left so entirely bereft of socialists that we have to have recourse to someone whose closing clarion call to us is to ‘be Zen’? I’d rather be socialist.

    https://www.thefullbrexit.com/extend-public-ownership

    0
    0

Comments are now closed.