‘This was a lawsuit from Israel against all activists’

JVL Introduction

Lawfare – the attempted use of the law to intimidate critics of Israel’s illegal and immoral policies and actions – got its comeuppance in a case in California earlier this month.

In 2018, Palestinian-American activist Suhair Nafal made a Facebook post that included a photo of Rebecca Rumshiskaya an American who had gone to Israel and become an IDF instructor.

Rumshiskaya duly launched a $6 million defamation lawsuit.

The attorney involved in defending the case was clear: “This was an Israeli initiative, by an enterprise that wants to silence activists, filed in hope of establishing a precedent.”

It didn’t.

Not that that will stop the pro-Israel hasbaristas (propagandists), but hopefully it will give them pause for thought…

This article was originally published by Mondoweiss on Fri 12 Mar 2021. Read the original here.

‘This was a lawsuit from Israel against all activists’: former IDF solider loses defamation case over Facebook post

A former Israeli solider who launched a defamation lawsuit against a Palestinian activist over a Facebook post, has lost her case in California.

Rebecca Rumshiskaya moved to Israel from Massachusetts in 2012 and became an instructor with the IDF. In 2018, Palestinian-American activist Suhair Nafal made a Facebook post that included a photo of Rumshiskaya. Nafal’s post came in response to the killing of Razan Al-Najjar, a 21-year-old paramedic who was shot by an Israeli sniper while tending to the wounded during the Great March of Return protests.

The IDF had used a photo of Rumshiskaya as a promotional photograph. Nafal’s uploaded the photo alongside one of Al-Najjar and drew a comparison between the two women, but did not imply that Rumshiskaya was connected to the killing in any way.

Two years after this post, Rumshiskaya launched a $6 million defamation lawsuit against Nafal with the help of the pro-Israel NGO Shurat HaDin. Rumshiskaya’s attorney called on the judge to apply Israeli defamation law against Nafal during the case.

On March 1 Judge Craig Griffin dismissed the case and granted Nafal an anti-SLAPP motion that will require Rumshiskaya to pay her legal fees.

“California law of defamation is shaped in large part by this country’s strong First Amendment right to free speech,” reads Griffin’s ruling. “…California substantive law tips the balance in favor of free speech more than Israel, for number of reasons…”

Nafal told Mondoweiss that she was relieved upon hearing the verdict, but happier for the Palestinian cause. “I’m more happy for other social media activists and people who post about Palestine. I knew this wasn’t just going to be a win for me, it was going to be a win for all us.”

Haytham Faraj, an ADC national board member and Nafal’s attorney, said the attempt to introduce Israeli law into a U.S. courtroom was truly unprecedented.

“This was not a lawsuit from Rebecca [Rumshiskaya] against Suhair,” he told Mondoweiss. “This was a lawsuit from Israel against all activists.”

Since so many people misinterpreted Nafal’s post, Faraj said Rumshiskaya had other options if the case was truly about her being defamed.

“[Rumshiskaya] could have found a court somewhere to issue a judgement finding that she had been injured in her reputation and that would have been some modicum of justice for her. She did not,” he explained. “This was an Israeli initiative, by an enterprise that wants to silence activists, filed in hope of establishing a precedent.”

Liz Jackson, senior staff attorney at Palestine Legal, told Mondoweiss that Nafal’s case should be understood within the wider context of pro-Israel attacks on speech. “The attack on Suhair Nafal, and her ability to overcome it, are emblematic of the censorship campaigns that systematically target the movement for Palestinian rights,” said Jackson. “Lawfare organizations, backed by the machinery of the Israeli state, routinely attack Palestinians and their allies with frivolous lawsuits like this one, not to mention relentless false accusations, harassment, doxing, and more.”

“Suhair and her legal team swatted down this harassing lawsuit and exposed it for what it is: a strategic lawsuit to suppress public participation in Palestinian liberation organizing,” continued Jackson. “Suhair’s victory should be a rallying call for everyone facing similar bullying attempts: Palestinian calls for freedom are too loud to censor.”

Nafal says she hopes her case will inspire others to share information on social media about Israel without the fear of repercussions. “My message to everybody is ‘Don’t be afraid’,” she told Mondoweiss. “Just keep posting. Now we have a case that proves we’re all protected by the First Amendment. I hope this emboldens and encourages everyone to continue to share content on their platforms without fear.”

Comments (3)

  • Mary Davies says:

    Brilliant result in the Californian court.

  • Sabine Ebert-Forbes says:

    At least someone stands up for freedom of speech. I wonder if that were possible in this country, but I doubt it considering all these policies that are eroding our human rights in the UK.

  • Machiela says:

    Well done Nafal ! You have succeeded in establishing a precedent in law. They are running rife in the U.K. trying to silence the Universities throughout. To me , the power in people is stronger than the people in power. Thank goodness that justice, truth and intelligence prevailed in this instance. I will never stop fighting for justice especially for the Palestinians and their country; freedom, dignity and human right against the oppressed throughout the world. The Oppressor must be exposed .

Comments are now closed.