Fighters against apartheid stand in solidarity with Jeremy Corbyn

Jeremy Corbyn, fifth from left, holding the banner

JVL Introduction

 

South African fighters against apartheid have rallied in force to voice their support for Jeremy Corbyn and to call his supension to be lifted immediately.

 

This article was originally published by Jacobin on Sat 14 Nov 2020. Read the original here.

We Fought Against South African Apartheid, and We’re Appalled by Jeremy Corbyn’s Suspension

Jeremy Corbyn’s suspension from the Labour Party is shameful, not least because he is one of the party’s most steadfast longtime anti-racist activists. We should know: we fought by his side to end apartheid in South Africa.

So appalled were Pallo Jordan, Ebrahim Ebrahim, and I at the Labour Party’s suspension of Jeremy Corbyn, their former leader, on October 29, that we drafted a petition directed to his successor, Keir Starmer, as follows:

We, South Africans, are deeply disturbed at the Labour Party’s treatment and suspension of Jeremy Corbyn. We can attest to his outstanding support for the liberation of South Africa from apartheid, and his resolute stand against all forms of racism, discrimination, antisemitism, xenophobia, injustice and oppression of people, wherever such evils are manifested. We stand in solidarity with Jeremy Corbyn and join those in Britain calling for his reinstatement without delay.

We were soon joined by other South Africans, who — like us — had worked and organized for the African National Congress (ANC) and the Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM), studied or lived in Britain during the struggle years, had many friends in the British labor movement, and had insight into, among other political and trade union formations, the Labour Party.

Here I refer to Essop and Aziz Pahad, Barney Pityana, Jeremy Cronin, Mandla Langa, Fazel Randera, Terry Bell, Mongane Wally Serote, Garth Strachan, Lawson Naidoo, Raymond Suttner, Eddie Webster, Horst Kleinschmidt, and Paula Ensor, among others — activists within South Africa and the international political arena to this day. Within a few days, our statement has been endorsed by two thousand concerned South Africans and others wishing to be associated with this initiative.

This includes Frank Chikane, Alec Erwin, Sydney Mufamadi, and the ANC’s deputy secretary-general, Jessie Duarte; retired military generals Siphiwe Nyanda and Jacqueline Sedibe; former ambassadors Mohammed Dangor and Ismail Coovadia; public servants Zane Dangor, Tim Wilson, and Ivan Pillay; trade unionists Irvin Jim, Bongani Masuku, Neil Coleman, Joe Foster, Percy Thomas, and Alistair Smith; journalists such as Amina Frense and Iqbal Jasset, human rights activists such as Xolela Mangcu, Noor Nieftagodien, Luli Callinicos, Brian Ashley, Nonkoni Ratshitanga, Jacklyn Cock, Neeshan Bolton, Jane Duncan, Na’eem Jeenah, Salim Valli, Langa Zita, Mercia Andrew, Renee Horne, Mark Weinberg, Zubeida Jaffer, John Pampallis, Noncebo Madonsela, and Ben Cousins; struggle veterans such as Snuki Zikalala and Sunny Singh; and a generation of younger activists such as William Shoki, Natalia Dinath, and Roshan Dadoo.

He has stood for decades in the cause of anti-racism, at times when it was far from popular or convenient. How many Labour MPs can match that type of record?It is not difficult to understand why Jeremy Corbyn’s plight has affected us. Solidarity is a two-way street. Many of us experienced, in the most direct sense, his commitment to our struggle to topple the apartheid regime and are able to testify to that. We find it a matter of principle to stand by him, as his adversaries lash out for a range of shameful and downright reactionary reasons, intent on destroying or emasculating him.

For his thirty-seven years as an MP, Jeremy Corbyn has been an inspirational force not only for Britain, where he had attracted hundreds of thousands of youth into the Labour Party, but internationally, too. He has been one of the few leaders anywhere to not only dare talk about socialism, but to link it creatively to the issues that ordinary people are facing, and to inspire millions with hope. He has stood for decades in the cause of anti-racism, at times when it was far from popular or convenient. How many Labour MPs can match that type of record?

Additionally, he has been a champion of the antiwar movement, opposing the disastrous invasion of Iraq and exposing George W. Bush and Tony Blair’s warmongering duplicity. He is an implacable opponent of fascism at home and abroad, and a brave voice in upholding people’s rights to independence and sovereignty against imperialism. That is an outstanding legacy which we are proud to support without reservation.

These are clear reasons why we South Africans are so forthright in our support for Jeremy Corbyn and are prepared to raise our voices in his defense. But I raise another — in fact, one that motivated Jeremy Corbyn in all his years of dedicated activism on our behalf — and that is the knowledge that the fight for justice and the truth only prevails when sufficient numbers of people make their demands heard in words and action. The current crop of Labour leaders should pay heed to that lesson of history.

It is simply not true that Corbyn was incorrect when he argued that antisemitism in the party was overstated for political reasons. In a country where a Survation poll found that the public believed that 34 percent of Labour members have faced complaints of antisemitism — over three hundred times the actual number — how can it be denied that the public perception of what is happening in Labour has been skewed?

That is clear to many members, including Jewish members in Corbyn’s own constituency of Islington North who have defended his record. One such member, Lynne Segal, has written that:

Our own views as Jewish members [were] completely ignored. Right now, along with the many other Jewish activists I know in Islington North, I am simply devastated that this process has climaxed in the suspension of our cherished MP, and former leader.

Solidarity in support of a just cause is a powerful weapon. We join forces with those demanding that Keir Starmer lift this shameful suspension on an honest and decent man, a champion of the oppressed who has always been dedicated to Labour’s cause. We need to step up the pressure to achieve this end — and not only in Britain.

Comments (3)

  • steve mitchell says:

    What is happening to our Party? My daughter phoned me yesterday to tell me about abuse being aimed at her Branch Secretary for suggesting a discussion on Palestine at their next CLP meeting (Zoom) .She is threatened with violence and ,of course she is accused of anti semitism. The media have gone to great lengths to paint the Corbyn led Party as one that brooks no dissent. The opposite is true. It is, and always has been the Right who have shut down debate and dissent. Unity? Don’t think so

  • Harry Law says:

    “It is simply not true that Corbyn was incorrect when he argued that antisemitism in the party was overstated for political reasons. In a country where a Survation poll found that the public believed that 34 percent of Labour members have faced complaints of antisemitism — over three hundred times the actual number — how can it be denied that the public perception of what is happening in Labour has been skewed?”
    Now Corbyn issues clarification on his face book page…..
    The reason Corbyn was suspended was because he said ” but the scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party” now he says “To be clear, concerns about anti Semitism are neither “exaggerated” nor “overstated”. So the general public’s perception of anti Semitism in the Labour party being 34% as set out in the book ‘Bad news for Labour’ is not overstated, the true figure being 0.03%.
    Seems like Corbyn is agreeing with Starmer his suspension was justified. PATHETIC.

  • Allan Howard says:

    I can’t quite get my head around what you’re saying Harry, but you appear to be deliberately misrepresenting what Jeremy said initially, and what he said in his facebook statement yesterday morning. So just to be clear, are you saying that Jeremy back-tracked on what he said in response to the EHRC report three weeks ago, which led to his (fraudulent) suspension a few hours later?

    We all know what Jeremy said – ie that the A/S problem in the LP has been massively overstated by political opponents inside and outside the party, and the media. And sometime later – so as to qualify what he’d said – he alluded to the survey conducted for the authors of Bad News For Labour in which respondents believed, on average, that 34% of LP members had been reported for A/S, and he then pointed out that the actual figure is 0.3% (or 0.03%). And what he said in his facebook statement was that the ‘CONCERN’ about anti-semitism has not been overstated or exaggerated.

    The extent of the problem of A/S in the LP is ONE thing, and the >concern< about it is entirely ANOTHER, but you appear to be saying that they mean the same thing – ie conflating the two. And they are NOT the same!

    So could you eloborate as to just precisely what it is that YOU think is 'pathetic', because it makes absolutely no sense to me that you would have any reason whatsoever to do so. Unless you're deliberately and fraudulently conflating the two, that is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Read our full comment policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.