Black Lives Labour

JVL Introduction

JVL welcomes the new organisation and website Black Lives Labour,  born from the anger and emotion that swept the world following the death of George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter protests which erupted in May 2020.

It aims to  link up the anti-racist struggles within the Labour Party, local authorities, the trade unions and our communities and is committed to campaigning relentlessly against racism both within the Party and within society.

Below we repost two short articles on the Sewell Report and reactions to it.


Sewell Report On Institutional Racism – Whose Side Are You On?

6th April 2021

The essence of this report is to divorce racism from class; to portray social class and the distribution of wealth as a neutral environment within which everyone has the opportunity to better themselves, and that failure or success is down to the capacities of individuals or groups. In order to establish this, it undertakes a revision of British colonial history, and deploys examples of those who have defied institutional racism to ‘disprove’ its existence.

Revision of colonial history

The most egregious revision of history is described by historian and TV presenter David Olusoga, “ Shockingly, the authors – perhaps unwittingly – deploy a version of an argument that was used by the slave owners themselves in defence of slavery 200 years ago: the idea that by becoming culturally British, black people were somehow beneficiaries of the system.’

Labour’s shadow Women and Equalities Secretary Marsha de Cordova accused the Chair, Dr Sewell, of “putting a positive spin on slavery and empire,” highlighting a paragraph in the foreword where he wrote: “There is a new story about the Caribbean experience which speaks to the slave period not only being about profit and suffering, but how culturally African people transformed themselves into a re-modelled African/Britain.”

As the Runnymede Trust commented, “That this Government see fit to comment on the slave trade as a ‘new story’ in which they commend the transformational ‘re-model’ of Black Britons is nothing short of shocking and racist.”

Samuel Kasumu, the government’s senior advisor on ethnic minorities resigned. Former equality and human rights commissioner Lord Simon Woolley said there was a “crisis at No 10 when it comes to acknowledging and dealing with persistent race inequality”.

Institutional Racism 

“The very suggestion that government evidence confirms that institutional racism does not exist is frankly disturbing. A young Black mother is four times more likely to die in childbirth than her white friend. A young Black man is 19 times more likely to be stopped and searched by the Metropolitan Police than his young white neighbour and those with Black or Asian ‘sounding surnames’ have to send in twice as many CVs as their white counterparts, with the same qualifications, to receive the same jobs. (Centre for Social Investigation at Nuffield College).

According to the Runnymede Trust: “As we saw in the early days of the pandemic, 60% of the first NHS doctors and nurses to die were from our BME communities, despite the NHS comprising only 20% BME staff in total. For Boris Johnson to look the grieving families of those brave dead in the eye and say there is no evidence of institutional racism in the UK is nothing short of a gross offence. Tell those 60% BME NHS doctors and nurses who died from COVID that institutional racism doesn’t exist.

“[and]… for ages 4-5, 10-11, 16 year olds at GCSE and 18 year olds at A-level, mixed white/Black African, white other, Pakistani, Black other, mixed white/Black Carribean, Black Caribbean, Irish traveller and Gypsy/ROMA all have lower attainment rates across the four categories used by the Commission compared to their white counterparts.”

David Lammy, author of the Lammy Report into the Criminal Justice system concluded,  “[…] having looked at the evidence over the past 18 months, my judgment is that we have a significant problem in the criminal justice system itself, and that the treatment of BAME young people shows this problem is getting worse […] Today 41% of under-18s in custody are from minority backgrounds.”

Nazir Afzal said: “Black people account for 3% of the population, but 8% of deaths in custody. As a former chief prosecutor, I know this is only the end point of a system that disproportionately suspects, arrests, convicts and imprisons BAME people […] of course, deaths in custody are only a small percentage of deaths following police contact, which include apparent suicides and police shootings, among other categories.”

As this website has recorded, the ‘hostile environment’, a deliberate creation by Tory governments, has institutionalised racism in the Home Office resulting in the Windrush scandal, and the appalling treatment of refugees, in fact itself breaking the law.

And the failure of any justice for the Grenfell residents.

It is the class system which drives oppression and exploitation, and institutional racism is a core component of this system. Wedded to capitalism Sewell, in seeking to impose a human face on this reality, has no alternative than to blame the victims for their own oppression.

As the Runnymede Trust commented: ‘This Commission lost the confidence and the trust of ethnic minority communities when Tony Sewell was appointed to lead it – a figure who had previously asserted that institutional racism does not exist, and whose commitment to the wider equalities agenda was questionable.’

As Doreen Lawrence put it more starkly, “Once you start covering it up it is giving the green light to racists. You imagine what’s going to come tomorrow. What’s going to happen on our streets with our young people? You are giving racists the green light,” Guardian

The Sewell report has received wide publicity across all mainstream media, much of it highly critical. In the Sunday Observer (4.4.21), Starmer had half the front page, and two further half page articles, but fails to make any reference to the Sewell report. The dangers seen by Doreen Lawrence don’t appear to be on his radar.


Johnson’s Policy Advisor Removed Institutional Racism From ‘independent’ Report On Institutional Racism

11th April 2021

Officials at Downing Street have been accused of rewriting much of its controversial report into racial and ethnic disparities, despite appointing an independent commission to conduct an honest investigation into inequality in the UK.

The Observer has been told that significant sections of the report published on 31 March were not written by the 12 commissioners who were appointed last July. The 258-page document was not made available to be read in full or signed off by the group, which included scientist and BBC broadcaster Maggie Aderin-Pocock and Samir Shah, former chair of the Runnymede Trust, nor were they made aware of its 24 final recommendations. Instead, the finished report, it is alleged, was produced by No 10.

Nor were they given sight beforehand of Tony Sewell’s forward.

“The Commissioners say that, “We did not deny institutional racism or play that down as the final document did. The idea that this report was all our own work is full of holes You can see […] that end product is the work of very different views.”

So, institutional racism is alive and well and living in Downing Street. And the leader of the Opposition, whose job it is to criticise government, is silent. This is collusion, and his position as leader of an anti-racist party is illegitimate.


Comments (4)

  • John Bowley says:

    The ingrained establishment hierarchies work against all ordinary people. But evidence indeed shows that disadvantaged minorities get worse than average.

    0
    0
  • Ian Hickinbottom says:

    It’s a wonder Starmer hasn’t praised the report and its findings. He likes and takes seriously flawed reports, whose conclusions are written in advance of any investigation.

    0
    0
  • Plenty of good points here, but it’s a pity that a few sentences from the Runnymede trust are incoherent and fail to understand simple mathematical concepts.

    When they say “in the early days of the pandemic, 60% of the first NHS doctors and nurses to die were from our BME communities, despite the NHS comprising only 20% BME staff in total”, you sort of understand what they mean.

    But when they say “Tell those 60% BME NHS doctors and nurses who died from COVID that institutional racism doesn’t exist.” it’s just wrong. 60% of BME doctors did not die from COVID, thank goodness. Not in the early days or subsequently. There are some 290,000 doctor registered in the UK, about 120,000 are employed by the NHS. About 44% of medical staff in NHS are BAME, so let’s estimate a very approximate 50,000 BAME doctors. 60% of that would be 30,000. Deaths are nowhere near that.

    Across all health professionals, I believe the number who died of COVID is below 1000, no more than a small single digit percentage of doctors whether BME or not. Every one is a tragedy, and many could have been prevented with decent PPE and processes in the early days, or earlier COVID and travel restrictions or…. but you know this. Until the precise role of racism, institutional or otherwise, in the deaths from COVID of BME and migrant work health is established as against other factors (genetic, geographic, class, environment in and away from work, work role, behavioural, linguistic, specific ethnicity, or perhaps they were braver or worked longer hours than non-BME staff and were more exposed – who knows?), it seems to me to be abusive to their memory to use it in an argument of this sort in this way.

    I’m open to counter-argument on this, but that’s how I see it at the time of writing.

    0
    0
  • amanda sebestyen says:

    Excited by the emergence of Black Lives Labour ! Hoping JVL and our Anti Racist Alliances Network will do a lot of joint solidarity work in future.

    0
    0

Comments are now closed.