A left-wing Jewish group is taking legal action against the Labour Party

JVL Introduction

As part of its #FactOfTheMatter series, the Canary is highlighting growing discontent in Keir Starmer’s Labour Party.

This report focuses on JVL’s very own case against the Party as well as describing the Labour Activists for Justice campaign which we are supporting.

All this is placed in a wider context of simmering discontent, including among MPs and the Labour in Exile Network, with its call for an “alternative” Labour Party conference in February 2021.

This article was originally published by the Canary on Wed 13 Jan 2021. Read the original here.

A left-wing Jewish group is taking legal action against the Labour Party

As part of our #FactOfTheMatter series, The Canary has been tracking increasing rebellion within the Labour Party. We can confirm that Jewish Voice For Labour (JVL) has now launched its own legal proceedings into the suspension of CLP members and an alleged ban on discussing motions relating to antisemitism within the Labour Party. JVL is also fighting a ban stopping members from passing motions of solidarity with former labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, or discussing the findings of the EHRC report.

It issued a statement on 24 December 2020 outlining the challenge:

JVL and suspended officers Marion Roberts and Louise Regan are challenging the right of the General Secretary to restrict freedom of speech and free political debate at our meetings.

We call upon David Evans, General Secretary, to rescind the existing instructions to Party members and to end the suspensions of any officers suspended for alleged breaches of these instructions.

According to the statement, chairs and secretaries of CLPs are banned from debating motions which include the following:

  • Expressions of support for the former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn following his suspension from the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP).
  • The findings of the EHRC Report
  • The merits and demerits of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s “Working Definition of Antisemitism” as party policy
  • The Labour Party’s decision to settle the BBC Panorama “whistleblowers” legal action against the party by in effect admitting liability and paying the claimants £600,000 out of party funds.

JVL’s case includes calls to:

(a) rescind the existing Instructions to Party members; (b) agree not to make any further wide ranging and a contextual requirements of this kind; and (c) bring to an end the suspensions of any officers of CLPs who have been suspended as a result of alleged breaches of the Instructions, including Dr Roberts and Ms Regan.”

There are also at least 35 recent or on-going investigations, targeting Jewish party members on grounds related to antisemitism.

Some CLP members have described the investigations as an ‘abuse of Jewish identity’.

An ‘abuse of Jewish identity’

The legal challenge follows increasing concerns from left-wing Jewish Labour members. In December, a statement from a group of 12 suspended Jewish members stated:

We are appalled by the large and growing number of Jewish members of the Labour Party – including ourselves – who have recently been subject to disciplinary proceedings related to alleged antisemitism. This fact alone – over and above the trumped up and politicised nature of the charges – makes a mockery of Keir Starmer’s commitment to ensuring Labour is a safe space for Jews. It is now abundantly clear that this commitment does not cover discrimination against Jewish socialists.

On the contrary, Starmer’s abuse of our Jewish identity and his willingness to exploit antisemitism as a political football is shameful and harmful not only to freedom of expression, but also to the fight against real antisemitism and racism of all forms, both in and outside of the Labour Party.

This is echoed in JVL’s legal action letter:

The General Secretary appears to believe the EHRC Report has given it a mandate to adjudicate on which understandings of Jewish identity are permissible and those that are not. It should be patently apparent it is neither competent nor empowered to do this and, by attempting this, it is further discriminating against, harassing and or victimising a section of its Jewish membership, in breach of the Equality Act 2010.

The legal case, which is being crowdfunded, has currently raised over £20,000 but is still calling for support and pledges.

Measures were never adopted

In 2016, a report by Shami Chakrabarti found the party’s disciplinary processes were unacceptable.

Since then, in a separate legal case, backed by JVL, Labour Activists 4 Justice issued legal proceeding over the Labour Party’s processes.

Whilst the JVL’s legal case focusses on the suspension of CLP members, Labour Activists 4 Justice’s case focusses on the Party’s ‘unacceptable’ disciplinary process, which were highlighted in 2016.

The legal case into Labour’s disciplinary process claims little has been done to implement recommendations from the Chakrabarti report:

Too many members are leaving the Party because they cannot see a way to challenge a leadership that shows no concern for the rules or respect for the members.

The injustice of the disciplinary processes became absolutely clear when Shami Chakrabarti was asked to look into how racism was dealt with by the Party. Her Report in 2016 identified clearly many unacceptable aspects of the Party’s disciplinary process and called for their replacement by clear rules of natural justice, transparency and proportionality.

Although adopted by the Party little was done to implement her recommendations – little if anything in the period when Iain McNicol was General Secretary and not enough under [Jennie] Formby.

Labour Activists 4 Justice has since crowdfunded over £62,000 and counting, to support legal proceedings against the Labour leadership.

However, it seems it’s not just Labour Activists 4 Justice or the JLV who are taking a stand, as a handful of MPs have reportedly shown their solidarity with former labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

The Labour MPs backing Corbyn

The following are MPs have been reported as ‘backing’ Corbyn:

  • Diane Abbott.
  • Tahir Ali.
  • Paula Barker.
  • Apsana Begum.
  • Olivia Blake.
  • Richard Burgon.
  • Dawn Butler.
  • Ian Byrne.
  • Dan Carden.
  • Mary Foy.
  • Rachel Hopkins.
  • Kim Johnson.
  • Ian Lavery.
  • Clive Lewis.
  • Rebecca Long-Bailey.
  • John McDonnell.
  • Ian Mearns.
  • Nav Mishra.
  • Grahame Morris.
  • Kate Osamor.
  • Kate Osborne.
  • Bell Ribeiro-Addy.
  • Lloyd Russel-Moyle.
  • Zarah Sultana.
  • Jon Trickett.
  • Mick Whitley.
  • Nadia Whittome.
  • Beth Winter.

Support the Canary – donate now

One MP in particular recently stood alongside a suspended party member. Former shadow home secretary Diane Abbott showed her support for suspended party member of Chingford and Woodford Green, Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi.

Wimborne-Idrissi’s, a JLV member, was suspended after stating at a CLP meeting that antisemitism had been “weaponised” by the Labour Party.

Reports claim that Wimborne-Idrissi claimed antisemitism was being “wheeled out” as an excuse to suppress freedom of speech and “silence socialist voices”.

While Wimborne-Idrissi and the JVL have been vocal in challenging the Labour Party leadership, they are not the only group seeking change.

Also seeking a review of suspensions is a newly established network: Labour In Exile.

A new Labour Party?

The Labour In Exile Network (LIEN) has gained over 500 members, following a wave of suspensions of local party members.

Founding member and ex-chair of South Thanet, Norman Thomas, was recently suspended after branch members collectively agreed to pass a motion supporting Jeremy Corbyn. The motion was reported to have been “proposed, seconded and supported by Jewish members”.

Despite the new group gaining support, Thomas has confirmed that they will not be looking to set up an opposing party.

Thomas told The Canary:

We are not aiming at forming a party at all.

Our new group will be a vital network for those who continue to fight for democracy and socialism in the Labour Party; for those who have been unfairly suspended of expelled in the last five years and those who have resigned from the Labour Party in desperation of the party direction of travel under Keir Starmer and his unendorsed General secretary, David Evans.

Instead, the network’s aim is to develop a ‘plan for change’. A plan that will launch at LIENs own Labour Party conference.

The “alternative” Labour Party conference 2021

LIEN has called for a one-day Alternative Labour Party Conference which will be held on 27 February 2021. The network hopes that the event will launch its own plan for change within the Labour Party.

While the network has not gone into detail about its plans for change, it told The Canary:

The main point of the plan for change is to democratise the party, to make MPs accountable to the members, strip the bureaucrats of their power and transform what is currently a ridiculously hierarchal outfit into a campaigning organisation run by its grassroots.

With increasing friction within the party, suspended members, instead of shrinking into the background of politics, are calling for the party to review itself.

The Canary’s previous investigation included a call for the Labour Party to have an open conversation, even if those conversations are hard. At that stage, it wasn’t clear how far campaigners will go to initiate it. The JVL, Labour Activist 4 Justice and the LIENs actions show that pressure will continue to be placed on the Labour leadership until it changes how the party operates.

The Canary contacted the Labour Party for comment, but had not received a response at the time of publication.

Featured image via Wikimedia

Get involved

  • If you’re a member of a CLP that has been suspended, contact us.
  • You can speak to Emma Guy on the Investigations Team by emailing emma.guy(at)thecanary.co
  • Alternatively, you can securely get in touch via our Tip Offs page here.
  • Bookmark our Investigations today, and never miss an exclusive.
  • Support The Canary to keep independent journalism alive.


Comments (5)

  • rc says:

    Norman Thomas spoke well and in a measured manner at the last physical Conference I recall (we were in the same row in the gallery; I was quite chuffed to gather he was from the next-door CLP.
    Best of luck to him…

  • Allan Howard says:

    The A/S smear campaign first really kicked off with totally false and contrived attack on Ken Livingstone, with bucket-loads of faux outrage to ‘cement’ their malicious and vexatious accusations against him. And it is of course no coincidence that Ken just happened to be one of the most high profile – if not the MOST high profile – ally of Jeremy’s. And THAT is why he was targeted of course!

    As you may know – and as reported by skwawkbox yesterday – Ken is taking legal action against the EHRC over ‘harassment’ claim and a right to free speech, along with Pam Bromley who was also named in the so-called report:


    Whilst doing some research yesterday in relation to Ken (for a comment I wanted to post on skwawkbox) I happened to come across an article in the Daily Mirror published on the 28th of April 2016 with the following headline and sub-headline:

    ‘Why I called Ken Livingstone a ‘Nazi apologist’ by Labour MP John Mann’

    ‘Ken Livingstone claimed Hitler wanted to move the Jews to Israel in 1932 to help the cause of Zionism. No he didn’t’

    Mann’s relatively short ‘article’ contains a number of falsehoods – all concocted and contrived to discredit and smear Ken of course – as you can see from just the sub-headline. And it is of course no coincidence that Mann just happened to write such a piece for the Daily Mirror, the majority of whose readers are Labour Party voters. I ended up posting a lengthy post on skwawkbox in respect of Mann’s article (including a link to the article) AND his falsehoods, and the following link takes you directly to my post (which is right at the bottom of the Comments section):


  • Peter Johnson says:

    I wonder how many Party Members are being ‘investigated’ – as well as those Sisters & Brothers already suspended & worse. On Dec 01, I was informed of my investigation & case number 6642. A date of Dec 16 was given as to whether zi’d be referred to the NEC. Just before Dec 16, i was told i was being subjected to ‘further investigation’ until January 17, 2021 (no futher contact details for the Samsritans or my GP – as if they were n’t busy enough). I am a rank & file Party Member in New Ferry, Wirral. I have never stood for a Labour Party Office. I have tried to raise funds for Palestinian Children (efforts usually blocked on Facebook with much subsequent distress). I have written to my MP – Alison McGovern twice (receiving no reply). One of the charges against me alleged I’ve brought the ‘Party into disrepute ‘ – as well as ‘anti-Semitism & promoting genocide'(!). I am a 61 year-old veteran of Anti-nazi League experience. “Stay Srong, Friends”.

  • Max J J Cook says:

    I’m still a democratic socialist and NOTHING Starmer (scammer) Rayner or the unelected Evans Can do about that, I’m still in the party because I won’t let them take my voice away like they did for a year before.
    I continue to be a Palestinian supporter and a TRUE supporter of Jeremy Corbyn and PJP SOLIDARITY FOREVER.

  • Les.hartop says:

    Labour in Exile is a great name, and it’s a positive place for victimised members to remain engaged whilst fighting back , on everyone’s behalf, in defence of free speech and a left alternative in British politics…. No small role !

    Importantly though, it also be a place to recommend to disaffected members we know who have left the Labour Party. No excuse now to disengage from politics, just put their slippers on or do the gardening.

    If you know anyone who recently left due to the actions of the New Labour leadership, then they are as much members in exile as those who have actually been suspended,
    so make contact and get them to stay engaged and do something useful with Labour in Exile.

    (They can of course also do the same by becoming registered supporters of JVL 🙂

Comments are now closed.